Numerical reasoning (Korn Ferry Talent Q)
Around 12 questions · 75 seconds for a new data set, 45 seconds for follow-ups on it
What it tests. Currency translation, percentage and compound growth (CAGR), ratio analysis and fast data interpretation.
Worked example. Given divisional revenue in EUR and shifting EUR/GBP rates, compute the percentage change in GBP terms; distractor options match common errors such as multiplying instead of dividing by the rate.
Common traps. Distractor answers that correspond to mistakes like simple two-year averages instead of geometric CAGR.
How to handle it. Do not linger on a dead-end; a blank drops your adaptive difficulty and caps your percentile, so make an educated approximation and move on.
Verbal reasoning (Korn Ferry Talent Q)
Around 15 questions · 75 seconds for a passage, 45 seconds for statement slides
What it tests. Separating verified evidence from assumption under time pressure.
Worked example. On a passage where a policy applies to all cross-border deals above £50m, the statement that emerging-market entities are 'formally exempt' is False; whether a breach reduces a bonus is Cannot Say.
Common traps. Bringing outside banking knowledge to validate a statement the text does not state.
How to handle it. Treat 'True' as needing literal verification, 'False' as directly contradicted, and 'Cannot Say' for anything not explicitly supported.
Logical / abstract reasoning (Plum)
About 10-14 puzzles · Untimed
What it tests. Fluid intelligence, spatial pattern recognition and rule induction.
Worked example. A 3x3 matrix where side counts increase by one across a row and internal symbols increase by one, with shading alternating; the missing tile is an octagon with three centred stars.
Common traps. Identifying only the first rule and missing a secondary overlapping transformation (rotation or shading).
How to handle it. Decompose each puzzle into independent components, outer shapes, inner symbols, line counts and shading, before checking the options.
Situational judgement (Plum)
About 15 scenarios · Untimed
What it tests. Teamwork, ethics, compliance and conflict resolution in a banking setting.
Worked example. An Associate instructs you to finalise a deck built on outdated, inflated market-share data; the best response checks in, presents the updated source and suggests a clarifying footnote, while escalating straight to the MD is the least effective.
Common traps. Choosing passive (avoid conflict) or aggressive (bypass the chain of command) options.
How to handle it. Filter every choice through risk awareness, long-term client focus and clear ethical standards; the right answer is proactive and collaborative.
Personality questionnaire (Plum)
About 30-40 screens · Untimed
What it tests. Behavioural consistency and alignment with Plum's talent model (execution, innovation, decision-making, adaptation).
Worked example. From statements on reviewing datasets for errors, leading ambiguous projects, or prioritising collaboration, rank Most and Least; reviewing datasets fits IBD, collaboration fits Corporate Banking and Wealth.
Common traps. Gaming the test with contradictory choices across screens, which the consistency engine flags.
How to handle it. Hold a consistent professional identity that matches your true strengths and your division's requirements.