Case study and business problem
Format. Individual analysis of a large multi-page data pack (financials, client briefs, market trends, regulatory updates), then a verbal cross-examination.
Duration. 60 minutes preparation, 45-60 minutes discussion
Panel. One Partner and one Senior Associate.
Assessed on. Commercial awareness, synthesising vast data quickly, risk identification, structural logic and communication under pressure.
Typical scenarios. A hypothetical corporate acquisition, a joint-venture restructuring, or a client facing technological disruption or a supply-chain crisis.
Common failure modes. Focusing on narrow legal definitions over commercial, financial and strategic risk, or failing to take a definitive stance when asked to recommend.
Tactical advice. Group issues systematically into financial/macroeconomic, operational/regulatory and client-specific reputational risk rather than reading the pack chronologically.
Financial interpretation (embedded)
Format. A financial interpretation and data-analysis exercise embedded in the case study; no dynamic Excel modelling, as the firm is a law firm not a bank.
Duration. Part of the 60-minute case-study window
Panel. Evaluated via the written output and the Partner interview.
Assessed on. Basic financial literacy, numeracy and the ability to spot discrepancies in business metrics (revenue, EBITDA, debt leverage, margins).
Typical scenarios. Analysing a target balance sheet or debt profile to judge viability under the current interest-rate environment.
Common failure modes. Being intimidated by tables, missing key footnotes, or failing to link financial vulnerabilities back to legal indemnities or contract clauses.
Tactical advice. Read trends over a three-year period; if profit falls while revenue rises, note expanding operational costs as a talking point for the partner round.
Group exercise
Format. A collaborative negotiation or strategy simulation with assigned stakeholder roles or a shared commercial crisis to solve.
Duration. 45 minutes (30 minutes discussion, 15 minutes presentation and Q&A)
Panel. 2-3 assessors observing silently.
Assessed on. Collaboration, negotiation, active listening, inclusion and advancing a collective objective under time pressure.
Typical scenarios. Allocating a limited budget across competing technology projects, or negotiating terms where candidates represent different divisions.
Common failure modes. Dominating to show alpha traits, interrupting peers, going silent through intimidation, or refusing to compromise into a deadlock.
Tactical advice. Prioritise inclusivity; if someone has not spoken, actively invite them in by name on a specific point such as the regulatory aspect.
Presentation
Format. An individual presentation of a solution to a business or technology issue, prepared in the case-study window or set on the day.
Duration. 5-10 minutes presentation, 5-10 minutes Q&A
Panel. One Partner and one Senior Associate.
Assessed on. Public-speaking competence, structured delivery, defending recommendations under pressure and clarity of thought.
Typical scenarios. Presenting the top three strategic risks a client must mitigate before expanding digital operations into a new jurisdiction.
Common failure modes. Reading from notes without eye contact, poor time management leading to being cut off, or falling apart on a challenging follow-up.
Tactical advice. Use a rigid explicit structure: state up front the three themes you will address, then deliver them in order.
Written exercise
Format. An individual, timed drafting exercise on a computer terminal or secure virtual platform.
Duration. 30-45 minutes
Panel. Completed individually in a quiet or proctored environment.
Assessed on. Written communication, grammatical precision, attention to detail and concise professional correspondence.
Typical scenarios. Drafting a summary email to a Partner or a brief advice note to a client explaining a complex issue from a dossier.
Common failure modes. Dense unstructured walls of text, failing to proofread, or running out of time.
Tactical advice. Use a professional email layout (clear subject, introduction, bullet-pointed findings, action-oriented conclusion) and reserve five minutes to proofread.
Partner and senior interview
Format. A high-level interactive discussion fusing the case-study debrief with commercial awareness and career motivation.
Duration. 45-60 minutes
Panel. One or two Partners.
Assessed on. Intellectual stamina, commercial gravitas, coachability and long-term career viability.
Typical scenarios. How the current interest-rate environment impacts private-equity clients appetite for leveraged buyouts.
Common failure modes. Defensive or argumentative behaviour when challenged, weak knowledge of the firm core strengths, or unable to discuss macro events logically.
Tactical advice. Treat it as a peer-to-peer business consultation. If challenged, acknowledge the point and explain how it shifts the priority of your mitigation strategy.