Back to J.P. Morgan guide

J.P. Morgan · Psychometric Tests

J.P. Morgan Psychometric Tests Prep

J.P. Morgan sifts candidates through Pymetrics (Harver) + SHL Verify G+ before any interview. Below: the exact format, what each section tests, and how to practise it in identical conditions until you walk in confident.

J.P. Morgan Pack

£69one-time

One-time payment. Yours for the whole application season.

  • Firm-specific HireVue question bank
  • Psychometric tests in the real formats
  • Live AI mock interviews, scored
  • CV reviews and cover letters
  • Full process map and intelligence brief
  • Vyo AI coaching
Get the J.P. Morgan Pack
7-day money-back guarantee
Every interview stage covered, end to end

Applying to several firms? The Season Pass is a yearly subscription covering every firm, £139 a year, cancel anytime.

The format

What J.P. Morgan's psychometric test actually looks like

Immediately after the application form and strictly before HireVue. The CV is held in a staging queue while the assessment is scored.

Timed sections

Most psychometric tests split into 3-5 sections, each with its own clock. Speed and accuracy both count.

Adaptive difficulty

Modern formats get harder if you answer correctly, easier if you struggle. Your final score reflects what you can actually do under time pressure.

Pass mark

J.P. Morgan sets a pass mark per test type. Below it, you don't progress regardless of how strong the rest of your application is.

Completion window. Links arrive within 24-48 hours of submission, with a strict 5-calendar-day completion window from the invitation timestamp. Missing it auto-withdraws the application.

By division. A dual-layered, multi-provider ecosystem: Pymetrics (Harver) behavioural games across almost all front-office streams, SHL Verify G+ cognitive tests for technical and quant tracks, plus an SJT, and a HackerRank/CodeSignal coding test for technology roles.

Recent changes. Over recent cycles the firm moved from standalone personality questionnaires toward tailored profile benchmarking, comparing gameplay against data from current high-performing analysts in the specific division.

The provider

What J.P. Morgan actually buys

J.P. Morgan configures its own selection of Pymetrics (Harver) + SHL Verify G+ modules. Below: the exact products in the suite, why they were chosen, and what the provider's reputation is across the candidate pool.

Modules in the suite

  • Pymetrics Core 12 Games Suite
  • SHL Verify G+ Numerical Reasoning
  • SHL Verify G+ Verbal Reasoning
  • SHL Verify G+ Inductive / Logical Reasoning
  • Situational Judgement Test
  • HackerRank / CodeSignal (technology tracks)

History at J.P. Morgan. Pymetrics has been used for several cycles to handle early-stage volume; SHL Verify G+ covers the cognitive layer for technical tracks.

Candidate reputation. SHL Verify G+ is seen as a fair, adaptive test of cognitive and mathematical skill under time pressure. Pymetrics is viewed as harder to read, since the behavioural traits sit beneath simple game mechanics and benchmark against a custom high-performer profile.

Section breakdown

What each part of the J.P. Morgan assessment tests

Each section has its own format, timer and trap pattern. Worked examples below show exactly what you will see and where candidates drop points.

Pymetrics games suite

12 games · About 25-30 minutes total (1-3 minutes per game)

What it tests. Risk tolerance, planning, learning adaptability, attention, altruism, effort allocation and emotional recognition.

Worked example. On the balloon game, pumping adds money but each balloon has a hidden pop threshold; the algorithm rewards calculated risk that adapts downward after a pop, not extreme caution or recklessness.

Common traps. Trying to act out an 'ideal banker' (extreme risk or hoarding) creates an inconsistent profile the system flags.

How to handle it. Use a desktop with a wired mouse for the speed games, pause to plan on the Tower game, and stay consistent and authentic.

Numerical reasoning (SHL Verify G+)

About 10 questions · 18-20 minutes (around 108-120 seconds per question)

What it tests. Financial chart interpretation, multi-currency conversion, percentage and yield changes and compound ratios.

Worked example. Index a freight division's revenue by a fuel-cost multiplier across quarters to compute a percentage increase, avoiding distractor options that match common partial errors.

Common traps. Spending too long early so later adaptive questions are rushed, and distractor answers that match forgetting a currency conversion.

How to handle it. Read the prompt and identify the needed columns first, keep a structured scratchpad and double-check units (thousands vs millions).

Verbal reasoning (SHL Verify G+)

About 10 passages · 10-12 minutes (60-72 seconds per block)

What it tests. Evaluating arguments, qualifying language and inference versus explicit fact under time pressure.

Worked example. On a passage noting regulators 'have considered' tiered deadlines, the statement that they 'have been implemented' is False; a statement about relative capital reserves not stated in the text is Cannot Say.

Common traps. Importing outside knowledge, and overlooking qualifiers like all, most, some, never or potentially.

How to handle it. If a statement is not explicitly supported by the text, it is Cannot Say; read the statement first, then scan, and cap each at about 75 seconds.

Inductive / logical reasoning (SHL Verify G+)

About 10 matrices · 10-12 minutes

What it tests. Non-verbal pattern recognition, spatial logic and tracking multiple elements in a sequence.

Worked example. A shaded triangle rotates clockwise, a dot alternates centre and corners, and a border alternates single and double; the fifth box follows all three rules at once.

Common traps. Analysing every element at once, or choosing an answer that satisfies only one of several hidden rules.

How to handle it. Isolate one element and track it across boxes, then check rules against the options to eliminate quickly.

Situational judgement test (SJT)

12-15 scenarios · Often untimed or a generous 20-25 minute block

What it tests. Professional judgement, prioritisation, conflict management and alignment with compliance and risk standards.

Worked example. Finding outdated comps data the night before a print deadline, the best response stays late to re-run the models and emails an update; leaving known-incorrect data with a verbal mention is least effective.

Common traps. Passive options (passing problems on, waiting for direction) or prioritising deadlines over data accuracy and compliance.

How to handle it. Choose active problem-solving and direct accountability; prioritise data precision, client interests and compliance.

Pass mark

How J.P. Morgan scores the assessment

J.P. Morgan uses percentile benchmarking, not a raw percentage. Performance is measured against the cycle's applicant norm group and a profile built from current high-performing analysts in the division.

Competitive percentile thresholds

  • Front-office (CIB). Top 20-25% (80th percentile and above)
  • Quantitative / technical. Often the top 10% (90th percentile)

Methodology. Metrics aggregate into an overall capability profile, but an extreme out-of-bounds metric (e.g. 99th percentile verbal but 30th numerical for a banking desk) triggers automated rejection; low-integrity or compliance-disregarding behaviour disqualifies automatically.

Response time. From 48 hours to about three weeks; a pass auto-generates the HireVue invitation.

Score visibility. No raw scores or percentiles are shown. Pymetrics emails a high-level Trait Report within 48 hours, but it omits the role-fit score and rank.

How to practise

Drill J.P. Morgan's exact format

Same provider, same section structure, same time pressure. With a scored report after every test so you can fix the weakest section before the real one.

  • Pymetrics (Harver) + SHL Verify G+-calibrated practice. Not a generic stand-in. The exact provider and section structure J.P. Morgan uses on the day.
  • Adaptive question difficulty. Questions get harder when you nail them, easier when you struggle. Walk away knowing where you actually stand.
  • Coaching, not just a score. "You are spending too long on table-data questions" beats "you scored 68%". Specific advice per weak section.
  • Percentile benchmarking. Your score compared to the UK candidate pool, so you know if 70% is excellent or worrying for that test.

Free practice section, scored. Full report unlocks with the Pack.

Why candidates fail

How candidates lose J.P. Morgan's assessment

Specific failure patterns documented across past applicants. Most are avoidable with structured preparation.

  1. 1

    Overthinking the Pymetrics games

    Manipulating answers to fit an imagined banker profile creates an inconsistent, flagged profile.

  2. 2

    Mismanaging adaptive SHL timing

    Spending too long on one early question leaves too little time for later adaptive ones.

  3. 3

    Outside assumptions in verbal

    Judging statements on external knowledge rather than the text.

  4. 4

    Passive SJT options

    Escalating minor issues or waiting for direction signals weak initiative.

  5. 5

    Failing the consistency check

    Contradictory risk profiles between the SJT and the games.

  6. 6

    Misreading multi-axis charts

    Confusing primary and secondary axes or unit scales under pressure.

  7. 7

    A distracting environment

    Background interruptions during fast attention games hurt response times and accuracy.

What works

What separates the candidates who pass

Concrete habits drilled by candidates who clear the cut-off, drawn from applicant accounts and practice patterns.

  • Fluent platform use

    Run practice modules first to learn the mechanics and shortcuts before the real test.

  • Strict time pacing

    Cap numerical questions near 90 seconds and verbal near 60, to finish the adaptive sequence.

  • The strict-fact rule

    Treat anything not explicitly proven by the text as Cannot Say.

  • Calibration runs

    Complete full-length timed mocks immediately before the live link to sharpen focus.

  • Deliberate pre-move latency

    Pause to plan the full sequence on the Tower and other planning games before the first click.

  • Consistent decision logic

    Hold a stable, authentic approach to risk and optimisation across all modules.

From past applicants

How recent J.P. Morgan candidates approached the assessment

Anonymised candidate accounts of how recent applicants approached the J.P. Morgan assessment. Each covers the prep, the experience, and the outcome.

Investment Banking summer analyst (passed)

Prep. Practised SHL adaptive numerical and verbal under time.

Experience. Links arrived about 24 hours after applying with a 5-day deadline. Did the Pymetrics games first (about 25 minutes), staying relaxed and balanced on the balloon game, then SHL numerical and verbal where the charts grew more complex as answers were correct. Held a strict Cannot Say rule on verbal.

Outcome. Portal updated four days later with a HireVue invite.

Global Markets (Sales & Trading, passed)

Prep. Drilled inductive patterns and timed numerical.

Experience. Combined the Pymetrics games (intense on the arrows and keypress modules) with SHL inductive and numerical. Paused about 10 seconds per Tower puzzle to plan, and tracked one shape at a time on the inductive matrices.

Outcome. HireVue advancement link about a week later.

Practice strategy

Where to drill the J.P. Morgan format

Practise the exact mechanics of both providers, not generic psychometrics.

  • SHL Verify G+ simulation

    The Intervyo JP Morgan pack runs the SHL Verify G+ adaptive numerical, verbal and inductive formats under real timing.

  • Pymetrics game preparation

    Learn the rules and pacing of the core 12 Pymetrics games beforehand so the format is familiar and anxiety is lower on the day.

  • Free practice on Intervyo

    Run psychometric practice in the relevant formats and keep a mistake log to avoid repeat errors.

Time investment. Passers typically invest 15-25 hours: a diagnostic (2-3h), targeted drills (10-12h) and full timed simulations (5-10h).

Time management

Five moves that protect your score

  1. 01Set your own clock per question. Divide section time by question count. Move on when you hit your per-question budget, even if you are mid-thought.
  2. 02Read the question before the chart. Half the work in numerical is finding the right number in a table. Knowing what you are looking for cuts the time in half.
  3. 03Use "Cannot Say" generously. Verbal reasoning rewards strict reading. If the passage does not say it, the answer is "Cannot Say", not your own inference.
  4. 04Skip the impossible ones. Most tests do not penalise wrong answers more than skips. If you cannot see it in 20 seconds, flag and move on.
  5. 05Practise the exact format, not a generic stand-in. Pymetrics (Harver) + SHL Verify G+ has its own rhythm, and a generic reasoning test is not the same. Intervyo's simulation is calibrated to this format, so you rehearse the real thing under real timing rather than a generic aptitude set.

FAQ

J.P. Morgan Psychometric Tests questions, answered

A desktop or laptop on the latest Chrome, Edge or Firefox with at least 2 Mbps. A wired mouse helps the speed-sensitive Pymetrics games.

The other rounds

The rest of the J.P. Morgan process

Psychometric Tests is one of four rounds. The Pack covers all four end to end.

J.P. Morgan Pack

Pass J.P. Morgan's psychometric test

Practise the exact Pymetrics (Harver) + SHL Verify G+ format ahead of time, scored against the J.P. Morgan pass mark. One Pack covers HireVue, psychometric tests, live interviews and the assessment centre.

Get the J.P. Morgan Pack · £69
7-day money-back guarantee

Intervyo is not affiliated with or endorsed by J.P. Morgan, SHL, Pymetrics, Cubiks, AON or any other assessment provider. Test details are sourced from past applicants and published guidance; verify on the firm's careers site before applying. Sector: Investment Banking.

J.P. Morgan Pack

£69 one-time

Get the Pack