Back to Linklaters guide

Linklaters · Psychometric Tests

Linklaters Psychometric Tests Prep

Linklaters sifts candidates through Cappfinity (situational strengths) and TalentLens / Pearson (Watson Glaser) before any interview. Below: the exact format, what each section tests, and how to practise it in identical conditions until you walk in confident.

Linklaters Pack

£69one-time

One-time payment. Yours for the whole application season.

  • Firm-specific HireVue question bank
  • Psychometric tests in the real formats
  • Live AI mock interviews, scored
  • CV reviews and cover letters
  • Full process map and intelligence brief
  • Vyo AI coaching
Get the Linklaters Pack
7-day money-back guarantee
Every interview stage covered, end to end

Applying to several firms? The Season Pass is a yearly subscription covering every firm, £139 a year, cancel anytime.

The format

What Linklaters's psychometric test actually looks like

A two-tier digital filter at the very start of the cycle, before any human reviews your form. You complete the application form and the Cappfinity assessment together, then the Watson Glaser, all before human review.

Timed sections

Most psychometric tests split into 3-5 sections, each with its own clock. Speed and accuracy both count.

Adaptive difficulty

Modern formats get harder if you answer correctly, easier if you struggle. Your final score reflects what you can actually do under time pressure.

Pass mark

Linklaters sets a pass mark per test type. Below it, you don't progress regardless of how strong the rest of your application is.

Completion window. The Cappfinity assessment is untimed and must be done before the application deadline. Submitting it starts a strict 5-day countdown to the Watson Glaser, which is 40 questions in 30 minutes. Missing the 5-day window withdraws your application automatically.

By division. Linklaters uses the same provider setup (Cappfinity then Watson Glaser) across all divisions, including London training contracts, regional offices and international schemes such as Singapore or the Middle East.

Recent changes. Linklaters introduced Cappfinity in September 2019 to replace long-form application questions, shifting the advantage away from heavily-vetted CVs toward natural behavioural strengths and problem-solving.

The provider

What Linklaters actually buys

Linklaters configures its own selection of Cappfinity (situational strengths) and TalentLens / Pearson (Watson Glaser) modules. Below: the exact products in the suite, why they were chosen, and what the provider's reputation is across the candidate pool.

Modules in the suite

  • Cappfinity bespoke Situational Strengths and Skills Assessment
  • Cappfinity behavioural ranking and data interpretation
  • Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (40 questions, 30 minutes)

History at Linklaters. Cappfinity in use since September 2019; the Watson Glaser has been the firm's primary intellectual filter for over a decade.

Candidate reputation. Cappfinity is known for an adaptive, untimed feel that rewards consistent, authentic responses. The Watson Glaser is regarded as one of the toughest psychometric tests in legal recruitment, requiring you to isolate cold logic from outside knowledge and assumptions.

Section breakdown

What each part of the Linklaters assessment tests

Each section has its own format, timer and trap pattern. Worked examples below show exactly what you will see and where candidates drop points.

Cappfinity situational judgement and strengths

Typically 15-20 scenarios with multiple sub-parts · Untimed (60-90 minutes average)

What it tests. Behavioural alignment with the Agile Mindset framework: Commercial Judgement, Determination, Excellence, Imagination, Integrity and Teamwork.

Worked example. A senior associate needs a 100-page due diligence review by 6pm; at 4:30pm a partner needs urgent research for a call in 30 minutes. The optimal action accepts the partner's task and emails the associate immediately with a progress update and a realistic new deadline (ranked above asking another trainee, above silently missing the deadline, with multi-tasking both under time pressure ranked least effective).

Common traps. The superhuman-trainee delusion (ranking all-nighters or simultaneous completion highest) and second-guessing what a perfect lawyer would say, which creates inconsistency the algorithm flags.

How to handle it. Lean toward solutions that protect the client, keep your supervisor informed and own mistakes. Because it is untimed, read every scenario twice.

Watson Glaser: Inference

7-8 questions · Part of the 30-minute block

What it tests. Distinguishing a conclusion that must be true from a merely plausible guess.

Worked example. Given a passage stating many companies are now legally required to use a double bottom line, the statement 'companies are entirely free to choose' is False. A statement about its effect on profit margins, on which the text gives no data, is Insufficient Data.

Common traps. Using real-world knowledge, and confusing Probably True with True. An inference is only True if it is impossible for it to be false based on the text.

How to handle it. Apply the four-walls rule: the passage is the entire universe. If a claim cannot be proven explicitly inside it, it cannot be definitively True or False.

Watson Glaser: Recognition of Assumptions

7-8 questions · Part of the 30-minute block

What it tests. Identifying unstated premises a speaker takes for granted.

Worked example. For 'we must implement AI document review so trainees can focus on high-value work', the assumption that the software accurately identifies relevant clauses is Made; the assumption that trainees enjoy manual review is Not Made.

Common traps. Selecting 'Made' simply because you agree with the overall point. Separate the logical architecture of the sentence from its sentiment.

How to handle it. Use the negation test: insert 'not' into the assumption. If that breaks the original argument, the assumption is Made.

Watson Glaser: Deduction

7-8 questions · Part of the 30-minute block

What it tests. Syllogistic reasoning: whether a conclusion must follow.

Worked example. All Magic Circle firms have London offices; some London-office firms run agile working. 'All Magic Circle firms run agile working' Does Not Follow. 'Some entities with London offices are Magic Circle firms' Follows.

Common traps. The transitive fallacy (if A relates to B and B to C, then A to C) and letting real-world knowledge overwrite a sound syllogism.

How to handle it. Visualise the premises as overlapping circles. If you can draw a case where the conclusion is false while the premises hold, it Does Not Follow.

Watson Glaser: Interpretation

7-8 questions · Part of the 30-minute block

What it tests. Deciding if a conclusion is justified beyond reasonable doubt by the data.

Worked example. Data shows mentorship programmes cut attrition 18% and raised billable hours 12%. 'Mentorship improves retention and productivity' Follows. 'Associates leave primarily because they feel unsupported by partners' Does Not Follow, as the text gives no data on why they left.

Common traps. Over-generalisation: extending a specific trend to a broader population or inferring causation from correlation.

How to handle it. Be suspicious of conclusions using absolute words (always, never, all) when the source uses qualifiers (often, some, tended to, many).

Watson Glaser: Evaluation of Arguments

7-8 questions · Part of the 30-minute block

What it tests. Distinguishing a directly relevant, important argument from a weak, emotional or tangential one.

Worked example. On mandatory sustainability reporting, an argument that transparent data lets investors direct capital to sustainable businesses is Strong; an argument that owners dislike paperwork and find it stressful is Weak.

Common traps. Labelling an argument Strong because you agree with its viewpoint, even when it is logically shallow.

How to handle it. Apply the relevance test: if the argument is true, does it actually solve or significantly affect the core issue? If it addresses only a minor byproduct or personal preference, it is Weak.

Pass mark

How Linklaters scores the assessment

Scoring is highly standardised, leaving no human discretion in the initial phases. Cappfinity uses a normative strengths-matching algorithm against a benchmark of successful trainees; the Watson Glaser is a percentile ranking against a legal norm group.

Competitive percentile thresholds

  • Watson Glaser (Magic Circle benchmark). Roughly the 75th percentile or higher to safely progress

Methodology. Watson Glaser is graded on percentile, not raw percentage: 34/40 might be the 78th percentile and pass, 30/40 the 62nd and fail. There is no negative marking on either test, so a blank and a wrong answer score the same. Cappfinity and Watson Glaser are evaluated together as a hurdle combination; a brilliant Watson Glaser cannot rescue low Cappfinity alignment, and a sub-threshold Watson Glaser is an automatic rejection regardless of grades.

Response time. Watson Glaser scores are held until the application deadline closes before any progression decision.

Score visibility. Recruiters see only your aggregated Watson Glaser percentile and your Cappfinity competency profile map, never your individual question responses.

How to practise

Drill Linklaters's exact format

Same provider, same section structure, same time pressure. With a scored report after every test so you can fix the weakest section before the real one.

  • Cappfinity (situational strengths) and TalentLens / Pearson (Watson Glaser)-calibrated practice. Not a generic stand-in. The exact provider and section structure Linklaters uses on the day.
  • Adaptive question difficulty. Questions get harder when you nail them, easier when you struggle. Walk away knowing where you actually stand.
  • Coaching, not just a score. "You are spending too long on table-data questions" beats "you scored 68%". Specific advice per weak section.
  • Percentile benchmarking. Your score compared to the UK candidate pool, so you know if 70% is excellent or worrying for that test.

Free practice section, scored. Full report unlocks with the Pack.

Why candidates fail

How candidates lose Linklaters's assessment

Specific failure patterns documented across past applicants. Most are avoidable with structured preparation.

  1. 1

    Mismanaging the 45-second rule

    Spending up to three minutes on a hard inference or deduction question, then having to guess the final 8-10 items without reading the passages.

  2. 2

    Applying real-world knowledge

    The most common pitfall for strong law students: using degree-level legal knowledge to answer rather than relying solely on the text.

  3. 3

    Overthinking Cappfinity

    Building an artificial persona of what recruiters want to hear, which produces inconsistent answers the algorithm flags as low role alignment.

  4. 4

    Confusing Insufficient Data with False

    Marking a statement False just because the passage does not support it. If the text does not explicitly deny it, it is Insufficient Data.

  5. 5

    Treating Cappfinity too casually

    Completing the untimed assessment in a distracting environment or across multiple sessions, leading to careless ranking choices below benchmark.

  6. 6

    Missing absolute qualifiers

    Overlooking words like all, never, only or always in conclusions that the source text only supports as a general trend.

What works

What separates the candidates who pass

Concrete habits drilled by candidates who clear the cut-off, drawn from applicant accounts and practice patterns.

  • Rigid four-walls discipline

    Treat each Watson Glaser passage as a self-contained universe, stripping away external context, opinion and common sense.

  • Systematic negation test

    On Recognition of Assumptions, state the opposite of the assumption and check whether it breaks the main argument rather than guessing.

  • Precise pacing

    Hold an average of 45 seconds per question and make an educated guess and move on after 60 seconds.

  • Authentic SJT alignment

    Answer Cappfinity as an organised, highly communicative, proactive trainee, favouring clear communication, risk management and collaboration over heroics or corner-cutting.

  • Warm up before the real test

    Run a full 30-minute timed practice simulation immediately before the live Watson Glaser to acclimatise to dense text and logical fallacies.

From past applicants

How recent Linklaters candidates approached the assessment

Anonymised candidate accounts of how recent applicants approached the Linklaters assessment. Each covers the prep, the experience, and the outcome.

Non-law graduate, London training contract (passed)

Prep. Practised the Watson Glaser under timed conditions for three days after the link arrived.

Experience. Completed the form and Cappfinity in one Tuesday-evening sitting, answering honestly as a collaborative colleague and prioritising clear communication. The Watson Glaser inference section felt harder than the practice packs and ran out of time on the last two questions, clicking random choices in the final 10 seconds.

Outcome. Invited to the assessment centre three weeks after the deadline. Takeaway: steady pace beats perfecting every answer.

Law student, spring vacation scheme (failed then passed)

Prep. Second attempt treated the Watson Glaser as pure abstract logic and used the negation test systematically.

Experience. Failed first time by using commercial and contract law modules to evaluate passages instead of the text. On the retry the following year, pretended to know nothing about each topic, and on Cappfinity avoided the super-trainee all-nighter options in favour of clear communication and managing expectations.

Outcome. Passed the assessment stage comfortably on the second attempt.

Practice strategy

Where to drill the Linklaters format

Generic psychometric prep is not enough; target the exact Cappfinity and Watson Glaser formats.

  • Official Linklaters practice portal

    A dedicated practice link on the early careers site using authentic Watson Glaser questions at the real difficulty.

  • JobTestPrep / AssessmentDay

    Realistic Watson Glaser simulators that replicate the 30-minute countdown and five-part structure.

  • Cappfinity-style SJT practice

    Materials using rating and ranking formats rather than standard multiple-choice, plus free format-specific practice on Intervyo.

Time investment. Candidates who pass typically dedicate 10 to 15 hours of focused study over the two weeks before the test.

Time management

Five moves that protect your score

  1. 01Set your own clock per question. Divide section time by question count. Move on when you hit your per-question budget, even if you are mid-thought.
  2. 02Read the question before the chart. Half the work in numerical is finding the right number in a table. Knowing what you are looking for cuts the time in half.
  3. 03Use "Cannot Say" generously. Verbal reasoning rewards strict reading. If the passage does not say it, the answer is "Cannot Say", not your own inference.
  4. 04Skip the impossible ones. Most tests do not penalise wrong answers more than skips. If you cannot see it in 20 seconds, flag and move on.
  5. 05Practise the exact format, not a generic stand-in. Cappfinity (situational strengths) and TalentLens / Pearson (Watson Glaser) has its own rhythm, and a generic reasoning test is not the same. Intervyo's simulation is calibrated to this format, so you rehearse the real thing under real timing rather than a generic aptitude set.

FAQ

Linklaters Psychometric Tests questions, answered

No. The assessments evaluate abstract logical reasoning and behavioural attributes. Everything needed to answer is provided within the text of the test.

The other rounds

The rest of the Linklaters process

Psychometric Tests is one of four rounds. The Pack covers all four end to end.

HireVueLive InterviewAssessment Centre

Linklaters Pack

Pass Linklaters's psychometric test

Practise the exact Cappfinity (situational strengths) and TalentLens / Pearson (Watson Glaser) format ahead of time, scored against the Linklaters pass mark. One Pack covers HireVue, psychometric tests, live interviews and the assessment centre.

Get the Linklaters Pack · £69
7-day money-back guarantee

Intervyo is not affiliated with or endorsed by Linklaters, SHL, Pymetrics, Cubiks, AON or any other assessment provider. Test details are sourced from past applicants and published guidance; verify on the firm's careers site before applying. Sector: Commercial Law.

Linklaters Pack

£69 one-time

Get the Pack