Grid Challenge (working memory and executive attention)
Multi-round, with sequences building from 3 dots to 5 dots · About 9 minutes
What it tests. Executive working memory: retaining, updating and recalling spatial sequences while processing distracting cognitive tasks, mirroring holding deal variables in mind while interrupted.
Worked example. A square highlights in the top-left, then you must judge whether two complex shapes are mirror images, then a second square highlights centre-right, and so on, before recalling the full ordered sequence.
Common traps. Over-focusing on the symmetry tasks until the spatial sequence is dropped, or ignoring the symmetry tasks (which are also scored), or recalling the right squares in the wrong order, which zeros the round.
How to handle it. Mentally label and repeat the squares like a mantra (top-left, centre-right) while solving the symmetry task. If you miss one, guess it instantly and keep tracking the rest. Maximise the early, shorter rounds.
Digit Challenge (mental arithmetic and computational speed)
As many as you can clear in the window · 5 minutes
What it tests. Quantitative fluency, mental agility and processing speed without a spreadsheet or calculator: raw comfort with number properties and reverse-engineering arithmetic.
Worked example. A blank-plus-blank-minus-blank equation that must equal 12; work backward from the result and the operators, identifying the largest single-digit multiples first when a multiplication sign and large target appear.
Common traps. Getting stuck on one complex equation for 30-45 seconds, which destroys the volume score, or weak operator-precedence (BODMAS) leading to invalid inputs.
How to handle it. Cap each equation at about 8-10 seconds. If it will not resolve, input quickly to clear it and get a fresh one. Practise single-digit mental-math tables intensively beforehand, and do not use a physical calculator, which is slower.
Switch Challenge (deductive logical reasoning)
Adaptive across the window · 6 minutes
What it tests. Deductive reasoning, rule absorption and non-verbal problem solving: deconstructing an unfamiliar abstract system and applying it error-free under time pressure.
Worked example. If the symbol that was 2nd in the top row is now 1st in the bottom row, the operator must begin with 2; eliminate every option that does not start with 2.
Common traps. Trying to map all four symbols at once, causing overload, or missing when the system switches from asking for the operator to asking for the output sequence.
How to handle it. Isolate a single position, find where it moved and eliminate options instantly; tracking just two symbols usually removes three of four choices in under 5 seconds. For stacked operators, compute the intermediate stage for only the first symbol.
Scales Verbal and Numerical (information processing and data retrieval)
Multiple statements per module · 12 minutes each
What it tests. Critical thinking, data cross-referencing and factual verification: filtering noise across multi-tab documents to find the exact data point, with no prior financial knowledge required.
Worked example. Given a statement that RBC's European revenue growth outpaced its Asian division across all of Q3, navigate to the correct tabs and decide True, False or Cannot Say strictly from the data shown.
Common traps. Reading tabs sequentially like a textbook and running out of time, or marking True based on real-world knowledge the tabs do not explicitly support (the answer is Cannot Say).
How to handle it. Read the statement first, pull out the keyword or metric, then click straight to the matching tab. Treat tabs as an index, and be disciplined with Cannot Say when the data does not directly cover the question (for example annual data against a quarterly claim).
ADEPT-15 personality questionnaire (work-related behaviour)
Roughly 150 items · Untimed (about 25-30 minutes)
What it tests. Cultural alignment, behavioural risk and competency fit across 15 traits (Task Achievement, Structure, Collaboration, Emotional Resilience and more) against RBC's ideal benchmark.
Worked example. Choosing between preferring a highly structured schedule for every project versus actively seeking out complex statistical problems others find frustrating, and indicating the intensity of that preference.
Common traps. The perfect-banker fallacy of agreeing with every aggressive or workaholic statement, which trips the social-desirability flag and can trigger automatic rejection; or total neutrality, which produces a flat, uninformative profile.
How to handle it. Be authentic but lean toward traits prized in front-office finance (resilience, comfort with ambiguity, data-driven choices, organised execution) while reflecting RBC's collaborative, risk-conscious culture. Stay internally consistent across the whole test.