UK training contracts.
Every deadline, free alerts.

Before a deadline in the table means anything, check whether a direct application exists at that firm at all. Sort your list into three categories. No direct route: the firm fills its intake from its own vacation scheme, so the date that governs you sits a cycle earlier, on /tracker/law-vacation-scheme. Genuine parallel route: a separate direct process with its own assessment, which the firm describes in its own words. Residual allocation: a direct route is open, but seats go to scheme converts before it is assessed, so you are applying for what is left.

Run the audit from each firm's own graduate pages, not a directory. Wording about most trainees joining through the schemes puts a firm in the third category even where a form exists; the scale of that conversion sits on /tracker/law-vacation-scheme. No form and no stated date puts it in the first. Two firms can share a January deadline and be entirely different propositions, so write the category beside each.

Direct training contract deadlines are more often hard cut-offs than rolling windows, with assessment starting once the window closes. Where a firm does review on arrival, the sifting habits and what they mean for timing are set out on /tracker/law-vacation-scheme. What you get instead is control over sequencing.

Draft a firm you are lukewarm about first, so your roughest commercial reasoning lands where it costs least. Put your real targets mid-window, once the why-this-firm answer has been rewritten a few times. Keep the last 48 hours clear, because portals slow near a cut-off. Fixed dates also cluster, so one January cut-off can mean six or eight forms inside a fortnight that already holds exams; your writing time there is the real limit on list length.

That is the test for every why-this-firm response. If a reader could no longer tell which firm you meant, it is not finished. Specificity comes from the practice mix, the clients the firm serves, and one piece of its work you can discuss concretely: what the deal was for and why it held your attention.

The rest of the screen adds a critical reasoning test of the Watson Glaser type, described on /tracker/law-vacation-scheme, then a case study and a partner interview that pushes back on any commercial view you offer.